In Tessl's internal testing, o3-mini triumphed over GPT-4.5, hinting at its prowess in AI-native development, particularly in code generation and documentation. Meanwhile, GPT-4.5 excelled at generating more natural tests, prompting debates about its potential preference for test generation rather than pure coding. Tessl's analytical methodology employed standardized evaluations, underscoring benchmarks that highlighted o3-mini's knack for effectiveness.










