DevSecOps Weekly Newsletter, Zeno. Curated DevSecOps news, tutorials, tools and more - Join thousands of other readers, 100% free, unsubscribe anytime. 

This blog post compares two popular incident response tools, PagerDuty and Splunk, to help you decide which one is best for your team. It highlights key factors to consider like alerting, incident response, automation, integrations, and pricing. PagerDuty is ideal for fast response and ease of use, while Splunk excels in data analysis and proactive prevention. Ultimately, the best tool depends on your specific needs. Explore both options and consider alternatives like Squadcast before making your choice.

This blog post explores the complexities and benefits of implementing a multi-cloud strategy.

The author outlines the key considerations like cost-saving potential, maintaining clarity across environments, and automation to manage complexity. Different cloud providers are compared for services like serverless functions and Kubernetes cluster deployment times.

The benefits of multi-cloud solutions include:

Improved data privacy and protection through regional storage and IAM customization.

Reduced vendor lock-in risk by facilitating easier migration between cloud providers.

Enhanced global access for geographically dispersed users.

However, challenges include the need for skilled personnel to manage multiple cloud environments and the increased complexity of cost management and security.

The blog concludes by highlighting the growing adoption of multi-cloud strategies and positions Squadcast, an incident management tool, as a VictorOps alternative for streamlining cloud operations.

This blog post compares two leading incident response tools: PagerDuty and Splunk On-Call (formerly VictorOps).

Choosing a VictorOps Alternative: PagerDuty is a robust alternative to Splunk On-Call, excelling in alerting, incident management, and automation.

Choosing a Splunk Alternative: If real-time alerting, collaboration, and swift response are your priorities, PagerDuty might be ideal. Splunk On-Call excels in data analysis and proactive problem identification.

Feature Breakdown:

Alerting & Escalation: PagerDuty offers real-time, multi-channel notifications with escalation policies, while Splunk On-Call focuses on data correlation and customization.

Incident Response: PagerDuty provides collaboration tools and centralized consoles, whereas Splunk On-Call centers on log analysis and root cause investigation.

Automation & AI: Both leverage automation and AI, with PagerDuty emphasizing alert grouping and workflows, and Splunk On-Call focusing on anomaly detection and predictive analytics.

Integrations: PagerDuty boasts seamless integrations with various tools, while Splunk On-Call prioritizes data source connections and custom app building.

Pricing: PagerDuty has tiered pricing starting at $25 per user per month, while Splunk On-Call's pricing is complex, ranging from a free tier to expensive enterprise plans.

Beyond the Giants:

The blog also introduces Squadcastas a contender, offering a blend of features from both PagerDuty and Splunk On-Call at an affordable price.

This blog post explores alternatives to Splunk On-Call (formerly VictorOps) because of potential drawbacks like cost, limited features, and hidden fees. It compares 9 VictorOps alternatives including Squadcast, Opsgenie, and Moogsoft. Key factors to consider when choosing an alternative are cost transparency, features, ease of use, and support. The blog highlights Squadcast as a strong replacement for Splunk On-Call due to its transparent pricing, all-in-one functionality, user-friendly interface, and excellent support.